Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that release at issue “expressly covered” both the type of injury “and its alleged causes,” namely “ ‘inadequate warnings or instructions’ from Rock Gym instructors”
• noting that UTPA 26 was “designed to meet the increasing need in Alaska for the protection of consumers as well as honest businessmen from the depredation of those persons employing unfair or deceptive trade practices” 27 (citations omitted)
• noting that the UTPA was designed to protect both consumers and “honest businessmen from the depredations of those persons employing unfair or deceptive trade practices” (quoting W. Star Trucks, Inc. v. Big Iron Equip. Serv., Inc., 101 P.3d 1047, 1052 (Alaska 2004))
• \A superior court's determination whether waiver occurred is a question of fact that we review for clear error.\ (quoting Sengul v. CMS Franklin, Inc., 265 P.3d 320, 324 (Alaska 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).