Alaska Supreme Court· 6/12/2009
Beal v. Beal
Citations
- 209 P.3d 1012
- 2009 Alas. LEXIS 77
- 2009 WL 1636273
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court has discretion to determine whether to give paying spouse “dollar-for-dollar credit” for (continued...
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fabe, Chief Justice, Eastaugh, Carpeneti, and Winfree, Justices
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stanhope v. StanhopeAlaska Supreme Court· 2013-08-09· cited 31×
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2012-01-20· cited 22×
- Windel v. CarnahanAlaska Supreme Court· 2016-09-23· cited 17×
- Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-18· cited 16×
- Herring v. HerringAlaska Supreme Court· 2016-05-13· cited 16×
- Junior Antenor, Keilan C. Ebli, and Loren J. Larson Jr. v. State of Alaska, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court· 2020-04-17· cited 15×
- Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2017-07-26· cited 14×
- Kollander v. KollanderAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-07-21· cited 13×
- In Re the Estate of SnyderMontana Supreme Court· 2009-09-02· cited 12×
- Kaleb Lee Basey v. State of Alaska, Department of Public Safety, Division of State Troopers, Bureau of InvestigationsAlaska Supreme Court· 2020-04-24· cited 8×
- Barber v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-03-17· cited 6×
- Robert A. v. Tatiana D.Alaska Supreme Court· 2020-10-23· cited 6×
- Raymond Dapo v. State of Alaska, Department of Health and Social Services, Office of Children's Services and Taun LucasAlaska Supreme Court· 2022-05-13· cited 5×
- Ebert v. Bruce L.Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-12-26· cited 4×
- Maxwell v. SosnowskiAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-05-18· cited 4×
- AAA Valley Gravel, Inc. v. TotaroAlaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-25· cited 3×
- Moody v. Royal Wolf LodgeAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-12-14· cited 3×
- Downs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2015-04-24
- Barber v. State, Dept. of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-03-17
- Mary Aparezuk v. Jeremy SchlosserAlaska Supreme Court· 2022-07-29
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-03-14· cited 77×
- Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court· 1966-04-21· cited 69×
- Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-09-15· cited 60×
- Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-02-16· cited 56×
- Ramsey v. RamseyAlaska Supreme Court· 1992-07-24· cited 51×
- Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-07-28· cited 44×
- Hooper v. HooperAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 40×
- Austin v. Fulton Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 36×
- Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court· 1999-04-16· cited 32×
- Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-03-23· cited 31×
- Beal v. BealAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-02-27· cited 28×
- Brown v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court· 1996-03-29· cited 14×
- Conner v. ConnerAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-04-18· cited 11×
- Broadribb v. BroadribbAlaska Supreme Court· 1998-05-08· cited 10×
- Dunlap v. DunlapAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-03-17· cited 10×
- Dieringer v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-07-03· cited 10×
- Bylers Alaska Wilderness Adventures Inc. v. City of KodiakAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-12-12· cited 10×
- Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 7×
- Carroll v. CarrollAlaska Supreme Court· 1995-10-06· cited 7×
- Alaska Railroad Corp. v. Native Village of EklutnaAlaska Supreme Court· 2006-09-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.