The Centennial Life Insurance Company v. Barbara Poston Victor Poston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that efficiency factor favored abstention when pending state action would settle the entire matter but federal declaratory judgment action would not
• stating that efficiency factor favored abstention when pending state action would settle the entire matter but federal declaratory judgment action would not
• recognizing the partial abrogation of pre-Wilton cases, including Nautilus, that “implied [stricter] constraints on district court discretion”
• noting that a declaratory judgment action should “not be used to try a controversy by piecemeal, or to try particular issues without settling the entire controversy”
• noting that a district court should hear a declaratory judgment action “when the judgment will serve a useful purpose in clarifying and settling the legal relations in issue”
• affirming decision of trial court to dismiss declaratory judgment suit because it would settle only part of controversy while pending state litigation could resolve entire matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).