United States v. Ronald Keith Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the claim that the statute under which the defendant was convicted violated the non-delegation doctrine of Article I of the Constitution was barred by an appeal waiver
• enforcing an appeal waiver despite defendant's contention that the statute under which he was convicted violated the non-delegation doctrine of Article I of the Constitution
• enforcing an appeal waiver despite defendant’s contention that the statute under which he was convicted violated the non-delegation doctrine of Article I of the Constitution
• explaining deference accorded to decision of district court to admit or exclude expert testimony under Daubert
• explaining that the experts’ “method and conclusions were not quantitative or testable by the scientific method” and that the government offered no supporting peer-review studies, but that the court reasonably credited the experts’ testimony that their method was “generally accepted”
• explaining reasons an appellate court gives a trial court’s rulings on the admissibility of evidence “considerable deference” under the abuse-of-discretion standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).