Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• exercising all writs authority to hold a statute in abeyance while this Court considered its jurisdiction and other matters in order to avoid rendering proceedings moot and precluding this Court, should it determine it had jurisdiction, from the “complete exercise” thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• League of Women Voters v. Data Targeting, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-05-27· cited 9×
• In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 (D)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-21· cited 6×
• Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(d)(1)(A) (Postconviction DNA Testing)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-15· cited 5×
• In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-03-29· cited 2×
• Flowers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-22
• Wryals v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-09
• Kent v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-08

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Allen v. Butterworth
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-14· cited 54×
• Dickinson v. Stone
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1971-08-03· cited 41×
• Moreau v. Lewis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 25×
• Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-10-18· cited 18×
• Division of Bond Finance v. Smathers
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-09-17· cited 8×
• Besoner v. Crawford
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-31· cited 4×
• Petit v. Adams
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1968-06-24· cited 4×