Supreme Court of Florida· 10/18/2001
Amendment to Fla. Rules of Cr. Proc.
Citations
- 807 So. 2d 633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relevance is not the test under Rule 3.853; rule requires that defendant explain how a DNA test will exonerate him or mitigate his sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hitchcock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-01-15· cited 50×
- Chandler v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-06· cited 34×
- Zollman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-10· cited 23×
- Amendments to Fla. Rules of Final ArgumentsSupreme Court of Florida· 2007-05-03· cited 18×
- Knighten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-04· cited 15×
- Hartline v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-01· cited 10×
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-11-24· cited 9×
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-21· cited 9×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-09-30· cited 9×
- Gaffney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-30· cited 8×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-16· cited 7×
- In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853 (D)Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-09-21· cited 6×
- Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853(d)(1)(A) (Postconviction DNA Testing)Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-09-15· cited 5×
- In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.170 & 3.172Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-03-29· cited 2×
- Dedge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-11-15· cited 1×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-16
- Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-01
- Block v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-11-03
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1979-07-26· cited 654×
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 248×
- Baggett v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-11-25· cited 222×
- State v. AshbySupreme Court of Florida· 1971-01-06· cited 186×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1975-12-03· cited 149×
- Younghans v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-31· cited 104×
- Counts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-26· cited 96×
- State v. Dist. Ct. of Appeal, First Dist.Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-11-01· cited 94×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1972-03-29· cited 89×
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-31· cited 74×
- Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-12-04· cited 34×
- In Re Amendments to Fla. Evidence CodeSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-26· cited 21×
- Lopez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-06-09· cited 21×
- Scalf v. SingletaryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-13· cited 18×
- Zeigler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-04-13· cited 15×
- Wade v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-05-16· cited 12×
- Neary v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-11-09· cited 11×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-01· cited 8×
- State v. SchultzSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-11-05· cited 8×
- Colonel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.