Skip to main content
· 4/14/2000

Allen v. Butterworth

Citations

  • 756 So. 2d 52
  • 2000 WL 381484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding certain provisions of the DPRA related to public records unconstitutional with the exception of one section that was “consistent with our proposed rules”
  • holding certain provisions of the DPRA related to public records unconstitutional with the exception of one section that was “consistent with our proposed rules”
  • stating that term ‘rules of practice and procedure' includes all rules governing parties, their counsel and court throughout progress of case from time of its initiation until final judgment and its execution
  • holding that the repealed rules are reinstated
  • noting that the “DPRA significantly changes Florida’s capital postconviction procedures.”
  • noting that the “DPRA significantly changes Florida’s capital postconviction procedures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.