S.D. Texas· 7/12/2001
Alexander v. Johnson
Citations
- 217 F. Supp. 2d 780
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24348
- 2001 WL 1916676
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- invalidating Texas stalking statute that prohibited calls intended to “ “harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend’ ”
- invalidating Texas stalking statute that prohibited calls intended to “ “harass, annoy, alarm, abuse, torment, embarrass, or offend’ ” (quoting Tdx. Penal Code Ann. § 42.07(a)(4)), aff’d sub nom. Alexander v. Cockrell, 294 F.3d 626 (2002
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2014-09-17· cited 101×
- State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-29· cited 16×
- State v. AlphonseCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-07· cited 3×
- Jung Park v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-08-11
- Fournier, CurtisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-10-28
- Dowden, Christopher TobyTexas Supreme Court· 2015-02-02
- Fournier, CurtisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2015-02-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.