Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding Nevada Constitution’s Double Jeopardy Clause prohibited a court from increasing the defendant's sentence on counts which were affirmed on appeal
• rejecting the aggregate sentencing analysis used in federal courts, and instead assessing the sentence on each count separately
• rejecting the aggregate sentencing analysis used in federal courts, and instead assessing the sentence on each count separately
• rejecting the aggregate sentencing analysis used in federal courts, and instead assessing the sentence on each count separately
• \[S]tates are free to provide additional constitutional protections beyond those provided by the United States Constitution.\
• \[S]tates are free to provide additional constitutional protections beyond those provided by the United States Constitution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stephans v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 32×
• State of Iowa v. Stevie Dewayne Harrington
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2011-11-04· cited 31×
• State v. Goncalves
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-02-21· cited 20×
• Adams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-07-12· cited 18×
• Amir H. Sanjari v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-01-15· cited 16×
• State v. Abram
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-01-15· cited 15×
• State v. McGee
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-08-15· cited 7×
• Bowser v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-05-16· cited 3×
• BOWSER (TERRENCE) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-05-16