Bowser v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presumption does not apply when the new, possibly longer, sentence is given by a different judge
• “[T]he presumption [of vindictiveness] does not apply where a different judge imposes a higher sentence . . . than the first judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Rojas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2025-02-27· cited 2×
• Elmajzoub (Said) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2019-09-26
• STEWART (TOMMY) v. NEV. BD. OF PAROLE COMM'R (CRIMINAL)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-09-25

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• Alabama v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
• Colten v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
• Chaffin v. Stynchcombe
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-21· cited 874×
• Wasman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 595×
• Texas v. McCullough
  Supreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 534×
• United States v. Rodriguez
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-03-25· cited 248×
• Silks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-02-12· cited 154×
• Chavez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2009-07-30· cited 142×
• People v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2015-12-21· cited 115×
• State v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-09-23· cited 56×
• United States v. Paul David Anderson
  Eighth Circuit· 2006-03-16· cited 25×
• Wilson v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2007-11-21· cited 20×
• Holbrook v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1974-02-12· cited 12×
• State v. Sierra
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-08-10· cited 6×