Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1/18/2007
Wilson v. State
Citations
- 726 N.W.2d 103
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 12
- 2007 WL 113960
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that evidentiary hearing was warranted because newly discovered evidence included affidavits from “three new witnesses” who “swear that they witnessed the shooting and that [the petitioner] was not the shooter.”
- concluding that evidentiary hearing was warranted because newly discovered evidence included affidavits from \three new witnesses\ who \swear that they witnessed the shooting and that [the petitioner] was not the shooter.\
- explaining that a postconviction hearing is “exactly the forum” to elicit details and examine truthfulness of witness testimony
- explaining that we have \cautioned postconviction courts not to determine that a recantation is unreliable without first taking the opportunity to evaluate the credibility of the witness at an evidentiary hearing\
- “While that portion of [the witness’s] postconviction testimony conflicts with his trial testimony, the conflict does not necessarily indicate that his trial testimony was false for purposes of the Larrison test.” (emphasis added)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Paul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bobo v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-08-22· cited 52×
- Dobbins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-09-16· cited 47×
- State v. TurnageSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-04-05· cited 34×
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-27· cited 27×
- Pippitt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-08-16· cited 26×
- Andersen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-06-13· cited 26×
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2013-01-30· cited 21×
- Vance v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-07-10· cited 20×
- Lincoln Lamar Caldwell v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-09-24· cited 20×
- Thomas Daniel Rhodes v. State of Minnesota, A13-560Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-02-17· cited 17×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-03-25· cited 15×
- Gustafson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-07· cited 6×
- Kevin Terrance Hannon v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2017-02-08· cited 3×
- Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-03-20· cited 2×
- State of Minnesota v. Ethan Joseph MetzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-10
- State of Minnesota v. Melissa Madelyne ZielinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2026-03-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-04-08· cited 130×
- Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2001-02-01· cited 110×
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-06· cited 102×
- Rainer v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-07-10· cited 86×
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 55×
- King v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-08-01· cited 29×
- Sutherlin v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-01-22· cited 29×
- Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-03-09· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.