Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 726 N.W.2d 103
  • 2007 Minn. LEXIS 12
  • 2007 WL 113960

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that evidentiary hearing was warranted because newly discovered evidence included affidavits from “three new witnesses” who “swear that they witnessed the shooting and that [the petitioner] was not the shooter.”
  • concluding that evidentiary hearing was warranted because newly discovered evidence included affidavits from \three new witnesses\ who \swear that they witnessed the shooting and that [the petitioner] was not the shooter.\
  • explaining that a postconviction hearing is “exactly the forum” to elicit details and examine truthfulness of witness testimony
  • explaining that we have \cautioned postconviction courts not to determine that a recantation is unreliable without first taking the opportunity to evaluate the credibility of the witness at an evidentiary hearing\
  • “While that portion of [the witness’s] postconviction testimony conflicts with his trial testimony, the conflict does not necessarily indicate that his trial testimony was false for purposes of the Larrison test.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.