Skip to main content

Opsahl v. State

Citations

  • 710 N.W.2d 776
  • 2006 Minn. LEXIS 116
  • 2006 WL 561210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that relief was unavailable in part because some recanting witnesses “reversed any recantation they may have made” and others “claim[ed] merely that they did not give a full explanation of their testimony at trial”
  • noting that “a simple statement contradicting earlier testimony” does not satisfy the first prong of Larrison
  • stating that “a simple statement contradicting earlier testimony” fails to meet the first prong of the test for recanted testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Barry, Gildea

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.