District of Columbia· 8/13/2004
Wilson v. Prudential Financial
Citations
- 332 F. Supp. 2d 83
- 2004 WL 1898290
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing the plaintiff to show good cause for his failure to properly serve the defendant by demonstrating that the defendant waived the defense of insufficient service
- court exercised its discretion and ordered the plaintiff to remedy the defective service rather than dismissing the claim where there was no indication that allowing the plaintiff to perfect service would unduly prejudice the defendant
- “[A]side from pointing out that [an attorney] was, and is [the defendant’s] counsel, the plaintiff offers no evidence indicating that [the defendant] authorized [its attorney], implicitly or explicitly, to receive service.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District of Columbia· 2005-05-31· cited 96×
- Candido v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2007-06-22· cited 67×
- Durgin v. MonS.D. Florida· 2009-09-21· cited 15×
- Mattiaccio v. Dha Group, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-02-26· cited 10×
- Angelich v. Medtrust, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2012-12-19· cited 9×
- Hardy v. Joseph I. Sussman, P.C.District of Columbia· 2013-07-12· cited 8×
- Miniter v. Sun Myung MoonDistrict of Columbia· 2010-09-07· cited 5×
- Gibson v. Boy Scouts of AmericaE.D. Virginia· 2005-01-10· cited 5×
- Alibalogun v. First Coast Security Solutions, Inc.District of Columbia· 2014-09-11· cited 5×
- United States ex. rel. Cody v. Computer Sciences Corp.District of Columbia· 2007-10-09· cited 5×
- Wilson v. Prudential FinancialDistrict of Columbia· 2007-03-01· cited 3×
- Wilson v. PRUDENTIAL FINANCIALDistrict of Columbia· 2009-03-30· cited 3×
- Hapugalle v. RaddatzDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-15· cited 1×
- Brodie v. WorthingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-21
- Hampton v. ComeyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-08
- Estate of Yevgenyi Scherban v. Suntrust BankDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-26
- Law Offices of Arman Dabiri & Associates P.L.L.C. v. Agricultural Bank of SudanDistrict of Columbia· 2019-01-16
- Alridge v. G4s Secure SolutionsDistrict of Columbia· 2019-07-08
- Patel v. Ambit GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-17
- Johnson-Richardson v. University of PhoenixDistrict of Columbia· 2020-02-04
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonD.C. Circuit· 2002-08-01· cited 1,521×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court· 1987-12-08· cited 1,419×
- Warren v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-02· cited 539×
- Macharia, Merania v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2003-07-11· cited 441×
- Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. AshcroftD.C. Circuit· 2003-06-20· cited 439×
- Cuthbert O. Simpkins v. District of Columbia GovernmentD.C. Circuit· 1997-03-14· cited 407×
- Roy W. Krieger v. Kathlynn G. Fadely,appelleesD.C. Circuit· 2000-05-05· cited 249×
- John F. Wroblewski v. City of WashburnSeventh Circuit· 1992-06-12· cited 238×
- Kingman Park Civic v. Williams, Anthony A.D.C. Circuit· 2003-11-14· cited 237×
- Gorman, David J. v. AmeriTrade Hold CorpD.C. Circuit· 2002-06-14· cited 179×
- Luise Light v. Isabel WolfD.C. Circuit· 1987-04-17· cited 166×
- Manuel Delos Santos, D/B/A M.S. Quisqueya Meat Market v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanySecond Circuit· 1990-05-07· cited 112×
- Hilska v. JonesDistrict of Columbia· 2003-07-11· cited 95×
- Karon L. Comeaux Sherrika Marzette Comeaux v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco CompanyNinth Circuit· 1990-09-26· cited 70×
- Nickens v. Labor Agency of Metropolitan WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-12-13· cited 60×
- Strass v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-AtlanticDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-01-20· cited 51×
- United States v. BosurgiS.D. New York· 1972-06-05· cited 43×
Other cases named Wilson v. Prudential Financial
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.