Skip to main content
· 6/12/1992

John F. Wroblewski v. City of Washburn

Citations

  • 965 F.2d 452
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13382
  • 1992 WL 127597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that under rational basis review, a government's classification \will not be set aside if any facts reasonably may be conceived to justify it\
  • suggesting that the loss of private employment could be the \plus\ in a stigma plus case
  • observing that Siegert’s “requirement that the defamatory statement be ‘incident to’ the adverse employment action is a strict one”
  • noting that “[t]he concept of liberty protected by the due process clause has long included occupational liberty—‘the liberty to follow a trade, profession, or other calling’”
  • noting that “[t]he concept of liberty protected by the due process clause has long included occupational liberty—‘the liberty to follow a trade, profession, or other calling’”
  • noting that “[t]he concept of liberty protected by the due process clause has long included occupational liberty—the liberty to follow a trade, profession, or other calling” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Fairchild

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.