Skip to main content
· 6/20/2003

Holy Land Foundation for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 333 F.3d 156
  • 357 U.S. App. D.C. 35
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 12701
  • 2003 WL 21414301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when the failure results in no prejudice to the nonmoving party, \we find [that] error to be harmless.\
  • holding that when the failure results in no prejudice to the nonmoving party, “we find [that] error to be harmless.”
  • holding that pre-deprivation process is not constitutionally required within the context of immediate asset blocking to prevent financial assistance to terrorism
  • concluding that an executive order blocking the property of certain terrorist organizations was not a substantial burden on the exercise of religion
  • holding that the district court abused its discretion in considering matters outside the pleadings in resolving a motion to dismiss
  • holding that where a court considering a Rule 12(b)(6) motion relies on matters outside the pleading, the motion must be treated as a Rule 56 motion for summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.