Skip to main content

Wilson v. Harlow

Citations

  • 860 P.2d 793
  • 1993 OK 98
  • 145 P.U.R.4th 512
  • 64 O.B.A.J. 2261
  • 1993 Okla. LEXIS 119
  • 1993 WL 256720

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a petition styled as a negligence and intentional tort action was in reality a collateral attack on rates and, therefore, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the OCC
  • holding no fiduciary duty at common law between utility’s directors and its ratepayers because utility was not a cooperative
  • holding no fiduciary duty at common law between utility’s directors and its ratepayers because utility was not a cooperative
  • “However, Hargrave is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar, which concerns a corporation rather than a cooperative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watt, Hodges, Simms, Opala, Summers, Lavender, Wilson, Kauger, Hargrave

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wilson v. Harlow

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.