Wilson v. Harlow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petition styled as a negligence and intentional tort action was in reality a collateral attack on rates and, therefore, within the exclusive jurisdiction of the OCC
• holding no fiduciary duty at common law between utility’s directors and its ratepayers because utility was not a cooperative
• holding no fiduciary duty at common law between utility’s directors and its ratepayers because utility was not a cooperative
• “However, Hargrave is clearly distinguishable from the case at bar, which concerns a corporation rather than a cooperative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).