American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \the term full `avoided costs' used in the regulations is the equivalent of the term `incremental cost of alternative electric energy' used in § 210(d) of PURPA\
• upholding the Commission's requirement that QFs receive full avoided cost rates, the statutory maximum under section 210
• upholding the Commission's adoption of full avoided costs rates, the statutory maximum under section 210
• upholding the Commission’s adoption of full avoided costs rates, the statutory maximum under section 210
• upholding the Commission’s requirement that QFs receive full avoided cost rates, the statutory maximum under section 210
• explaining that under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review a court “need not find that [the agency’s decision] is the only reasonable one, or even that it is the result [the Court] would have reached had the question arise in the first instance in judicial proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).