Dickson v. Dickson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Contempt proceedings may be had to enforce any order of the court incorporated in a decree of divorce for the payment of money, whether the order arose from the agreement between the parties or the court made such order absent the agreement of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2006-05-09· cited 109×
• Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1984-10-10· cited 71×
• Wilson v. Harlow
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-07-13· cited 25×
• Cray v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1996-09-24· cited 24×
• First National Bank & Trust Co. of Ada v. Arles
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1991-07-30· cited 20×
• MM Resources, Inc. v. Huston
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1985-12-10· cited 9×
• Riedel v. Riedel
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1992-12-08· cited 9×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dickason v. Dickason
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-02-19· cited 64×
• Marshall v. Marshall
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1961-04-11· cited 31×
• Potter v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1980-04-01· cited 29×
• Hawkins v. Hurst
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1970-03-31· cited 26×
• Merchants Delivery Service v. Joe Esco Tire Co.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1972-05-23· cited 25×
• Hicks v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1966-05-10· cited 18×
• Fisher v. Fisher
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1976-12-28· cited 17×
• Bras v. Gibson
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1974-11-26· cited 16×
• Sullins v. Sullins
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1955-02-01· cited 10×
• Thomas v. Thomas
  Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-02-28· cited 4×