Tenth Circuit· 4/19/2010

Wilson v. Astrue

Citations

602 F.3d 1136
2010 WL 537864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an ALJ should consider the nature of daily activities among other factors in assessing subjective complaints
holding that in order to quality for disability insurance benefits, a claimant must establish that they met the statutory requirements for disability on or before their date last insured
recognizing that “complaints of severe pain that do not readily lend themselves to analysis by objective medical tests are notoriously difficult to diagnose and treat” (collecting cases, including cases addressing fibromyalgia)
holding that the evidence employed by an ALJ to reject a diagnosis of myo-fascial pain syndrome as a “possibility” rather than a necessary limitation on a claimant’s capacity to work was adequate
concluding that the ALJ’s determination was supported by substantial evidence, even though some aspects of the evidence “standing alone would be insufficient to support an adverse credibility finding as to a subjective pain complaint”
holding an ALJ’s consideration of ADLs is a permissible part of substantial evidence supporting credibility evaluation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Brorby, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wilson v. Astrue

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.