Ramona KEPLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ALJ’s listing of factors he considered was inadequate, where court was “left to speculate what specific evidence led the ALJ to [his conclusion]”
• holding that “[cjredibility determinations are peculiarly the province of the finder of fact” (quotation omitted)
• holding that ALJ’s analysis of credibility of subjective complaints is inadequate if ALJ merely states conclusion that pain is not disabling without making express findings with reference to relevant evidence
• holding that an ALJ must consider certain factors in assessing credibility, and must explain why specific evidence relevant to each factor supports a conclusion that a claimant's subjective complaints are not credible
• holding that ALJ must closely and affirmatively link credibility findings to substantial evidence
• holding that ALJ must closely and affirmatively link credibility findings to substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).