Tenth Circuit· 4/13/2017

Thomas v. Berryhill

Citations

685 F. App'x 659

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that ALJ had sufficiently “consider[ed] all the evidence, both objective and subjective” in finding that the claimant’s pain was not disabling (quotation omitted)
where ALJ evaluates a claimant’s subjective complaints and explains the evidence he relies on, “[n]othing more is required” for a consistency analysis
where ALJ evaluates a claimant’s subjective complaints and explains evidence he relies on, “[n]othing more is required” for a consistency analysis
where ALJ evaluates a claimant’s subjective complaints and explains evidence he relies on, “[n]othing more is required” for a consistency analysis
where ALJ evaluates a claimant’s subjective complaints and explains evidence he relies on, “[n]othing more is required” for a consistency analysis
where ALJ evaluates a claimant’s subjective complaints and explains evidence he relies on, “[n]othing more is required” for credibility analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, Matheson, McHugh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.