Court of Appeals of Maryland· 4/22/2010
Williamson v. State
Citations
- 993 A.2d 626
- 413 Md. 521
- 2010 Md. LEXIS 175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that DNA tested for identification purposes is “akin to . . . a fingerprint”
- noting that the 13 junk loci consist of stretches of DNA that “do not presently recognize traits” and “are not associated with any known physical or medical characteristics”
- finding that Williamson’s argument regarding potential misuse of DNA beyond the testing of the 13 junk loci, which was not alleged in the case, did not have “feet”
- analogizing the abandoned DNA on the cup to a garbage bag left outside the curtilage of a home
- analogizing the abandoned DNA on the cup to a garbage bag left outside the curtilage of a home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Battaglia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-05-02· cited 60×
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-12· cited 35×
- Raynor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-08-27· cited 30×
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-04-24· cited 25×
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-08-22· cited 21×
- Sinclair v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-27· cited 20×
- Raynor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-09-29· cited 15×
- Sinclair v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-25· cited 10×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-28· cited 8×
- Moats v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-10-25· cited 7×
- Varriale v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-07-30· cited 6×
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 5×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-02-04· cited 5×
- Grimes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-10-28· cited 5×
- Brewer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-29· cited 4×
- State v. EmersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-02-10· cited 4×
- State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-17· cited 3×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-14· cited 2×
- Williamson v. MarylandSupreme Court· 2010-10-18· cited 1×
- State v. McDonnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-07-07
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court· 1970-11-23· cited 9,465×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court· 1984-04-02· cited 3,218×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court· 1987-01-14· cited 1,722×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.