Skip to main content
· 10/25/1996

Williams v. Time Warner Operation, Inc.

Citations

  • 98 F.3d 179
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27683
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,375
  • 1996 WL 583252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that at summary judgment, a court views all facts and 10 inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant
  • explaining that at summary judgment, a court views all facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duhe, Politz, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.