Skip to main content
· 3/31/1994

Mai E. Gilley v. Protective Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 17 F.3d 775
  • 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1232
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5959
  • 1994 WL 81725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the contention that an argument first raised in response to a motion for summary judgment is waived on appeal
  • reversing and rendering judgment for the adverse party on cross motions for summary judgment.
  • “We have held that an argument is waived if the party fails to make the argument in response to summary judgment.” (citation omitted)
  • “[T]he doctrine of waiver or estoppel cannot be used to create a primary liability or to increase the coverage of insurance contracts.”
  • “We have held that an argument is waived if the party fails to make the argument in response to summary judgment.”
  • plaintiff did not mention an issue in complaint or any other time until responding to summary judgment; trial court had to consider that new issue in ruling on motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Garza

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.