· 3/31/1994
Mai E. Gilley v. Protective Life Insurance Company
Citations
- 17 F.3d 775
- 18 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1232
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5959
- 1994 WL 81725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the contention that an argument first raised in response to a motion for summary judgment is waived on appeal
- reversing and rendering judgment for the adverse party on cross motions for summary judgment.
- “We have held that an argument is waived if the party fails to make the argument in response to summary judgment.” (citation omitted)
- “[T]he doctrine of waiver or estoppel cannot be used to create a primary liability or to increase the coverage of insurance contracts.”
- “We have held that an argument is waived if the party fails to make the argument in response to summary judgment.”
- plaintiff did not mention an issue in complaint or any other time until responding to summary judgment; trial court had to consider that new issue in ruling on motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Garza
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.