Entertainment by J & J, Inc. v. Al-Waha Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that § 605 provides for greater recovery than does § 553, and that “[r]ecovery generally is not available under both provisions”
• looking at the amount the defendant would have paid and then increasing the amount to deter future violations
• noting “the limited methods of intercepting closed circuit broadcasting of pay-per-view events and the low probability that a commercial establishment could intercept such a broadcast merely by chance”
• looking to plaintiffs lost revenue as a result of defendants’ violation to determine award
• finding willfulness given the “limited methods of intercepting closed circuit broadcasting of pay-per-view events” and “the low probability that a commercial establishment could intercept such a broadcast merely by chance”
• finding willfulness given the “limited methods of intercepting closed circuit broadcasting of pay-per-view events” and “the low probability that a commercial establishment could intercept such a broadcast merely by chance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).