Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 121 So. 3d 524
  • 38 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 605
  • 2013 WL 4555586
  • 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a new trial is the proper remedy where the- defendant objected to the failure to instruct the jury
  • noting that the appellant sold a stolen video game system and games to a pawn shop the >day after the theft and concluding that the dealing in stolen property and grand theft offenses were in connection with one scheme or course of conduct
  • noting that the plain and ordinary meaning of the words of a statute must control and that when a statute is clear, a court need not look behind the statute’s plain language for legislative intent or resort to rules of statutory construction to ascertain intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.