Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 453 So. 2d 1192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the theft of a car stereo and the sale of that stereo two days later were part of the same scheme or course of conduct
  • rejecting the state's attempt to limit the grand theft count to a stolen car, and the dealing in stolen property count to a stereo system
  • reversing the convictions for grand theft and dealing in stolen property “[s]ince the theft of the car and the stereo and the sale of the stereo two days later were all a portion of the same scheme or course of conduct”
  • convictions for both grand theft and dealing in stolen property could not stand in that sale of stereo had occurred two days after its theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Hendry and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.