Skip to main content

Parker v. State

Citations

  • 254 A.2d 381
  • 7 Md. App. 167
  • 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that in considering the propriety of an instruction, “even if it be so construed, there was no error in the instruction requiring reversal, as the defendant received more than that to which he was entitled”
  • “the distinction . . . is not so much between temporary and permanent insanity as it is one between the direct results of drinking, which are voluntarily sought after”
  • “the distinction . . . is not so much between temporary and permanent insanity as it is one between the direct results of drinking, which are voluntarily sought after”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.