Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1/9/1986
Branch v. State
Citations
- 502 A.2d 496
- 305 Md. 177
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 179
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining why a single eyewitness identification is sufficient to permit a jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
- explaining why a single eyewitness identification is sufficient to permit a jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
- “The issue of credibility, of course, is one for the trier of fact.”
- criteria for review of sufficiency same whether verdict rendered by jury or court
- Testimony of a single eye witness will support a jury conviction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith, Eldridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-21· cited 213×
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-29· cited 96×
- Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-04-16· cited 88×
- Gunning v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-10-14· cited 76×
- Pittman v. Atlantic Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-07-12· cited 67×
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-04· cited 56×
- Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-22· cited 52×
- Ebb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- Braxton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-11-06· cited 43×
- State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-13· cited 34×
- Archer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-10-07· cited 32×
- In Re Timothy F.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-08-28· cited 32×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-15· cited 26×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-19· cited 26×
- Eades v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-06-06· cited 25×
- Warsame v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-19· cited 23×
- Acquah v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-12-26· cited 20×
- In Re Gloria H.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-09-14· cited 19×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-02· cited 18×
- Oliver v. HaysCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-04· cited 14×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Malcus T. Clemons v. United States of America, David E. Clark v. United States of America, Alvin C. Hines v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-12-06· cited 373×
- Tichnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-06-10· cited 300×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-11-20· cited 248×
- Rhodes v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 235×
- Basoff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-10-01· cited 102×
- People v. AshIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-09-28· cited 80×
- Edmond Jackson v. Walter Fogg, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, RespondentSecond Circuit· 1978-12-19· cited 75×
- State v. RuskCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-01-13· cited 75×
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-07-08· cited 70×
- Kucharczyk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-06-23· cited 68×
- United States v. Richard Harrison RussellSixth Circuit· 1976-03-30· cited 60×
- Crawley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-06-04· cited 53×
- United States v. Bernard Richard LeviFourth Circuit· 1968-12-19· cited 52×
- Bedford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-03-24· cited 49×
- Kaufman v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-10-01· cited 45×
- State v. GluffSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-11-07· cited 41×
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-04· cited 40×
- Walters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-04-19· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.