Supreme Court of Delaware· 12/2/2008
Williams v. State
Citations
- 962 A.2d 210
- 2008 Del. LEXIS 549
- 2008 WL 5064756
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the “‘community caretaker’ or ‘public safety’ doctrine” as an “exception” to the warrant requirement
- recognizing the “modern police officer” as a “‘jack-of-all-emergencies”’ when adopting the community caretaker doctrine
- noting that warrantless seizures are presumed to be unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment
- “During a consensual encounter, a person has no obligation to answer the officer‟s inquiry and is free to go about his business.”
- approach and questioning of defendant walking on highway median was not a seizure, and, even if it was, seizure was justified under public safety exception
- “We adopt [the Lovegren] test to ensure that investigations conducted in Delaware under the community caretaker doctrine are reasonable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-08-16· cited 131×
- State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court· 2013-11-21· cited 103×
- State of Tennessee v. Kenneth McCormickTennessee Supreme Court· 2016-05-10· cited 73×
- STATE of Tennessee v. James David MOATSTennessee Supreme Court· 2013-03-22· cited 52×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-20· cited 38×
- Stafford v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-12-04· cited 36×
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-04-06· cited 25×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-07-13· cited 19×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-09-02· cited 19×
- Olson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-28· cited 7×
- People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals· 2024-05-21· cited 7×
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2011-03-03· cited 6×
- Dehn Motor Sales, LLC v. SchultzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-06-26· cited 4×
- Com. v. Patterson, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-11-07· cited 3×
- State v. HarrisSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-07-25
- State v. McDowellSuperior Court of Delaware· 2016-10-31
- Carello v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-02-08
- Loat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2017-02-22
- State of Delaware v. Cody W. ShutakDelaware Court of Common Pleas· 2017-09-29
- State v. HamiltonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2017-10-12
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court· 2005-03-22· cited 937×
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 525×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-12-16· cited 208×
- State v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 204×
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 132×
- Bies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-03-15· cited 118×
- Lopez-Vazquez v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-29· cited 105×
- State v. PinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-10-24· cited 104×
- Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2001-01-24· cited 84×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.