Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 962 A.2d 210
  • 2008 Del. LEXIS 549
  • 2008 WL 5064756

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the “‘community caretaker’ or ‘public safety’ doctrine” as an “exception” to the warrant requirement
  • recognizing the “modern police officer” as a “‘jack-of-all-emergencies”’ when adopting the community caretaker doctrine
  • noting that warrantless seizures are presumed to be unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment
  • “During a consensual encounter, a person has no obligation to answer the officer‟s inquiry and is free to go about his business.”
  • approach and questioning of defendant walking on highway median was not a seizure, and, even if it was, seizure was justified under public safety exception
  • “We adopt [the Lovegren] test to ensure that investigations conducted in Delaware under the community caretaker doctrine are reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steele, Holland, Berger, Jacobs, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.