Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 8/16/2018

Commonwealth v. Edwards

Citations

194 A.3d 625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that where a sentencing court is informed by a PSI, we presume it is aware of all appropriate sentencing factors and considerations
stating that where a trial court is informed by a PSI report, it is presumed that the court is aware of all sentencing factors and its discretion should not be disturbed
stating that where a trial court is informed by a PSI report, it is presumed that the court is aware of all sentencing factors and its discretion should not be disturbed
concluding “that police acted reasonably and pursuant to the community caretaking doctrine when observing [Edwards] limping, with a bloody leg, at 1:20 a.m., in that they approached and offered [Edwards] medical assistance”
concluding “that police acted reasonably and pursuant to the community caretaking doctrine when observing [Edwards] limping, with a bloody leg, at 1:20 a.m., in that they approached and offered [Edwards] medical assistance”
finding a substantial question for review where the defendant claimed that the trial court relied on an improper factor when imposing its sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gantman, Shogan, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.