Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 987 So. 2d 1
  • 2008 WL 90003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that counsel was not ineffective for failing to file a motion where there was no legally sufficient basis for doing so
  • holding counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek the disqualification of the trial judge where counsel felt that he did not have a good-faith basis for filing a disqualification motion
  • holding counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek the disqualification of the trial judge where counsel felt that he did not have a good-faith basis for filing a disqualification motion
  • applying Rule 26, Ala. R. Civ. P., when determining whether nonparty subpoena should be quashed or modified for exceeding scope of discovery
  • vacating Williams’ death sentence after finding that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigation that would have precluded the jury override to the judge
  • “Nothing in this decision should be construed to prohibit the trial court from considering the imposition of consecutive sentences for the various crimes and convictions involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.