Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that new sentences must be reversed when the original sentences were concurrent and the new sentences were consecutive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gisi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-10· cited 13×
• Warren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 3×
• Netherly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-16· cited 3×
• Isom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 3×
• Cowan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hale v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 430×
• State v. Stabile
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-04· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-10· cited 13×
• Gaskins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-25· cited 6×
• Alfonso v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-26· cited 6×
• Somerville v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-12· cited 5×
• Colwell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-07-05· cited 2×