Somerville v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a witness' relevant opinion that he believed a class ring was stolen was not demonstrably based on anything perceived by him, so that section 90.701 did not allow its admission into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• L.L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-04-06· cited 21×
• Bartlett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-10-29· cited 9×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18· cited 5×
• Gonzales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-08-22· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• North Carolina v. Pearce
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Alabama v. Smith
  Supreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
• Wemett v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-08-30· cited 46×
• SYKES EX REL. SYKES v. St. Andrews School
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-09· cited 10×
• Alfonso v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-26· cited 6×
• Womack v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07· cited 4×
• Somerville v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-15· cited 4×