Gaskins v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant, who had previously challenged habitual offender sentence on direct appeal of conviction, was precluded by law of the case from relitigating habitual offender issue on appeal from order on motion to correct sentence
• \A per curiam affirmance establishes the law of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-02-24· cited 8×
• Leyba v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-03· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18· cited 5×
• Warren v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 3×
• Isom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 3×
• DERRELL A. RICHARDSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-21

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Whitehead v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-10-30· cited 271×
• Winters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-24· cited 21×
• State v. Stabile
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-04· cited 18×
• STATE, COM'N ON ETHICS v. Sullivan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-19· cited 15×