Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Florida courts have generally utilized the statutory definition of `weapon' provided in section 790.001(13) to determine whether a particular object constitutes a `weapon' for purposes of section 812.13(2)(b)\
• evidence that victim suffered pain and had blisters raised on his nose and shoulders insufficient to establish that hot coffee was a weapon under robbery statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• C.A.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-15· cited 22×
• Nguyen v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-17· cited 20×
• Stanley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-31· cited 8×
• Blanco v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-17· cited 7×
• Hutchinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-22· cited 7×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-12· cited 6×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-18· cited 5×
• Holley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-20· cited 5×
• Tribbitt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-18· cited 4×
• Perez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-05· cited 2×
• CAC v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-15
• Matthews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-10
• J.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• D.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-08· cited 22×
• Gust v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-28· cited 11×
• Bates v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-01· cited 10×
• Streetman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-09-07· cited 8×