Archer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The facts which were relied upon ... for a reversal of the ruling ... on the motion for a new trial, are contained in a bill of exceptions, and all of them were offered ... upon the motion for a new trial. It is very clear that no such bill of exceptions is authorized by law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-10-01· cited 93×
• Merritt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-12-05· cited 52×
• Pinkney v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-04-06· cited 14×
• Kirsner v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-16· cited 11×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-02-24· cited 11×
• Byers v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1885-03-10· cited 8×
• Busey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1897-01-07· cited 7×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sittig v. Birkestack
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1873-06-19· cited 16×
• Merrick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1871-01-13· cited 8×