Skip to main content

Ward v. State

Citations

  • 706 S.E.2d 430
  • 288 Ga. 641

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendants had the right to be present when the court dismissed a juror
  • holding that the defendants could not knowingly acquiesce to a waiver by their attorneys where they were not informed that a juror was removed outside their presence or the reason for the removal
  • holding that because the defendants were not informed of a trial juror’s removal outside their presence or the reason for the removal, they could not knowingly acquiesce to the waiver by their attorneys
  • explaining that acquiescence “ ‘means a tacit consent to acts or conditions, and implies a knowledge of those things which are acquiesced in’ ” (citations omitted)
  • explaining that acquiescence “means a tacit consent to acts or conditions, and implies a knowledge of those things which are acquiesced in”
  • explaining that acquiescence “means a tacit consent to acts or conditions, and implies a knowledge of those things which are acquiesced in”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.