Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 405 S.E.2d 38
  • 261 Ga. 347
  • 1991 Ga. LEXIS 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an actual conflict existed where defense counsel's representation of a witness in an unrelated matter precluded him from cross-examining the witness at the appellant's trial
  • holding that an actual conflict existed where defense counsel’s representation of a witness in an unrelated matter precluded him from cross- examining the witness at the appellant’s trial
  • holding that when a State witness was a current client of defense counsel in an unrelated criminal matter, counsel’s ability to cross-examine the witness was constrained
  • defense counsel objected at trial to conflict because he had obtained privileged information from the witness in the unrelated criminal matter
  • conflict of interest arising from defense counsel’s simultaneous representation of defendant and state’s witness continued even after defense counsel was relieved of his representation of the state’s witness
  • conflicts can arise from defense counsel’s representation of prosecution witness in unrelated matters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.