Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 12/2/2011

Williams v. Hobbs

Citations

  • 662 F.3d 994
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 23956
  • 2011 WL 6004086

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming post- trial finding that Wardens’ reviews were not meaningful where they frequently checked pre-printed boxes stating that Williams remained a “threat to the security and good order of the institution” as their only written justification for continued Ad Seg

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Smith, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.