· 5/23/2000
Shoats v. Horn
Citations
- 213 F.3d 140
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 11417
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the prisoner received procedural due process via periodic reviews and the right to be heard
- holding that periodic review of inmates indefinitely confined to AC meets minimum due process requirements
- holding that “virtual isolation for almost eight years” in solitary confinement created a protected liberty interest
- holding that periodic reviews by the PRC comport with minimum constitutional standards for due process
- holding that periodic reviews by the PRC comport with minimum constitutional standards for due process
- recognizing that inmate’s liberty interest was adversely affected by his indefinite segregation in administrative custody
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.