Williams v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court “not bound by a pro se litigant’s characterization of his course of action. Rather a court must determine the proper characterization of a filing by the nature of the relief sought.”
• \The Court is not bound by a pro se litigant's characterization of his cause of action. Rather a court must determine the proper characterization of a filing by the nature of the relief sought.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Brown
  District of Columbia· 2016-05-05· cited 7×
• United States v. Mitchell
  District of Columbia· 2013-07-15· cited 5×
• United States v. Smith
  District of Columbia· 2015-10-06· cited 5×
• United States v. Mathis
  District of Columbia· 2009-10-05· cited 4×
• United States v. Fields
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-05-09· cited 4×
• United States v. Amaya-Ortiz
  D.C. Circuit· 2017-11-03· cited 2×
• United States v. Fashina
  District of Columbia· 2011-07-15
• Feaster v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
  District of Columbia· 2010-06-01
• Amin v. Barr
  District of Columbia· 2020-07-20
• United States v. Knowles
  District of Columbia· 2021-02-05
• Wright v. Bolster
  District of Columbia· 2021-03-19
• United States v. Marlow
  District of Columbia· 2021-07-08
• United States v. Masud Al Safarini
  District of Columbia· 2021-11-01
• United States v. Summer
  District of Columbia· 2022-03-30

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Castro v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2003-12-15· cited 1,352×
• James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-06-18· cited 503×
• United States v. Mario Howard Lloyd
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-03-01· cited 64×
• United States v. Akers
  District of Columbia· 2007-11-06· cited 19×
• Moore v. Smith
  D.C. Circuit· 2006-07-06· cited 2×