United States v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying petitioner’s pro se motion for a sentence reduction under Section 3582(c) because the Fair Sentencing Act, was not retroactive; transferring petitioner’s pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence to the D.C. Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Fields
  D.C. Circuit· 2019-05-09· cited 4×
• United States v. McDade
  District of Columbia· 2014-04-29
• United States v. Mitchell
  District of Columbia· 2019-06-27
• Wright v. Bolster
  District of Columbia· 2021-03-19

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dillon v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 2,002×
• Burton v. Stewart
  Supreme Court· 2007-01-09· cited 1,506×
• Dorsey v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 1,010×
• Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2012-06-21· cited 916×
• United States v. Edwina Bigesby
  D.C. Circuit· 2012-06-22· cited 48×
• United States v. Tepper
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-08-06· cited 19×
• United States v. Akers
  District of Columbia· 2007-11-06· cited 19×
• Williams v. Gonzales
  District of Columbia· 2008-07-22· cited 17×
• Harris v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2007-11-26· cited 15×
• United States v. Mitchell
  District of Columbia· 2012-01-30· cited 10×
• United States v. Mitchell
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-11-21· cited 2×
• Davis-Rice v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-03-16· cited 2×