James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [habeas] remedy afforded under [28 U.S.C.] § 2241 is not an additional, alternative or supplemental remedy to that prescribed under § 2255.”
• Section 2255 is “not considered inadequate or ineffective simply because [ ] relief has already been denied … or because the petitioner is procedurally barred from pursuing relief under § 2255”
• “[C]laims seeking to challenge the execution or manner in which the sentence is served shall be filed in the court having jurisdiction over the prisoner's custodian under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.”
• unfavorable outcome alone does not render remedy inadequate under habeas statute’s savings clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).