United States v. Mario Howard Lloyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that respondent should seek a remand when a district court rules on a collateral attack over which it lacked jurisdiction
• noting that regardless of the name of a filing, \[i]t is the substance that controls\
• Section 3582(c)(2) “permits” the district court to reduce a defendant’s sentence “when the Sentenc- ing Commission has reduced the applicable Guidelines range and made the change retroactive.”
• \ Castro 's warn-and-allow-withdrawal approach does not apply [to successive petitions].\
• indicating a motion to dismiss may accompany a response brief
• unexplained resolution of a motion is a reviewable final decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).