Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 6/30/1998

Willenbring v. Neurauter

Citations

48 M.J. 152
1998 CAAF LEXIS 43
1998 WL 380497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that rape was a capital crime for statute of limitation purposes regardless of whether the necessary factors were present to sentence the accused to death in that case
observing that § 803(a) “close[d] the loophole left by Hirshberg when there is a break in military service”
noting that the military has no court-martial jurisdiction over former servicemembers who have severed all ties with the military and are not serving with an armed force
observing that the discussion sections of the Rules for Courts-Martial “are not part of the Manual and . . . . do not contain official rules or policy”
requiring the military judge to make additional findings of fact and conclusions of law as to the issue of termination of service during any further proceedings in the case
explaining the “non-binding” nature of the discussion sections within the Rules for Courts-Martial, “which are not part of the Manual and . . . do not contain official rules or policy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Effron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.