Skip to main content

United States v. Sloan

Citations

  • 35 M.J. 4
  • 1992 CMA LEXIS 150
  • 1992 WL 192366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • convening authority must state reasons for denial of deferment of confinement so that the decision can be reviewed by abuse standard
  • “Allen itself clearly reflects [that] our decision there was not dependent solely upon this statutory provision”
  • an accused may assert protection of a regulation “only if it was prescribed to protect an accused’s rights”
  • the convening authority’s decision on a deferral request “must include the reasons upon which the action is based” in order to facilitate judicial review (footnote omitted)
  • both cases finding no relief warranted after applying a prejudice analysis
  • “policy typically is not law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Sloan

26 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.