United States v. Claude C. Wild, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant validly waived the statute of limitations by executing both a written waiver the defendant’s attorney prepared, which was then delivered to law enforcement, and another waiver prepared by law enforcement
• holding that the statute of limitations is non-jurisdictional and defendant expressly waived it; observing in dicta that a statute of limitations defense should be raised no later than the trial
• holding that the statute of limitations is non-jurisdictional and defendant expressly waived it; observing in dicta that a statute of limitations defense should be raised 46 no later than the trial
• holding defendant could validly waive statute of limitations in effort to prevent being indicted during the completion of plea negotiations with the prosecution
• holding defendant could validly waive statute of limitations in effort to prevent being indicted during the completion of plea negotiations with the prosecution
• reasoning that, like the right to be represented by counsel or the right not to be put twice in jeopardy, the statute of limitations defense should be waivable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).