Skip to main content

Mullins v. State

Citations

  • 46 P.3d 1222
  • 30 Kan. App. 2d 711
  • 2002 Kan. App. LEXIS 506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the court could not find prejudice when \defendant's argument was founded on sheer speculation\
  • finding defense attorney rendered ineffective assistance when he did not consult with expert concerning interviewing techniqués used in child sex abuse cases
  • counsel cannot insulate ineffective assistance by labeling it strategy; where outcome of trial depended on child sexual abuse victim’s statements, failure to investigate, employ expert to attack testimony constituted deficient performance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Marquardt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.