District of Columbia· 7/13/2011
Wilhelmus v. Geren
Citations
- 796 F. Supp. 2d 157
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75020
- 2011 WL 2714854
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[njothing could be more arbitrary or capricious” than “two identical cases [being] decided differently”
- applying this distinction after both parties agreed that the ordinary, non-military standard of review should apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: James E. Boasberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Grace v. WhitakerD.C. Circuit· 2018-12-17· cited 38×
- Remmie v. MabusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-10-15· cited 20×
- Bates v. DonleyDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-27· cited 15×
- Does 1-72 v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-10· cited 14×
- Martin v. DonleyDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-21· cited 12×
- Saint-Fleur v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-17· cited 12×
- Spadone v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2012-02-08· cited 10×
- Budik v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-07· cited 9×
- McDonough v. MabusDistrict of Columbia· 2012-11-29· cited 8×
- Spadone v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2012-06-06· cited 6×
- Ronald J. Helferty v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-11-15· cited 5×
- Reeder v. JamesDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-14· cited 4×
- Gilbert v. WilsonD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-27· cited 3×
- Manning v. FanningDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-29· cited 1×
- Lind v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-07
- Barrett v. McHughDistrict of Columbia· 2014-10-31
- Gilbert v. JamesDistrict of Columbia· 2018-02-27
- Grace v. SessionsDistrict of Columbia· 2018-12-19
- Relx, Inc. v. BaranDistrict of Columbia· 2019-08-05
- Barker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2019-09-06
Cites
26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 8,453×
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 2,871×
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 2,333×
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldD.C. Circuit· 2006-01-10· cited 1,529×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court· 2009-04-28· cited 1,340×
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-17· cited 1,192×
- Sierra Club v. MainellaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-25· cited 384×
- Compton James Richards v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceD.C. Circuit· 1977-03-18· cited 344×
- John F. Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceD.C. Circuit· 1989-02-07· cited 339×
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseD.C. Circuit· 1995-10-31· cited 267×
- Fund for Animals v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1995-09-29· cited 211×
- Paper Converting MacHine Company v. Magna-Graphics CorporationFederal Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 201×
- Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States Department of the InteriorD.C. Circuit· 2010-07-16· cited 125×
- Billy Ray Kidwell v. Department of the Army, Board for Correction of Military RecordsD.C. Circuit· 1995-06-13· cited 123×
- Bloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L.D.C. Circuit· 2003-11-21· cited 117×
- Bloch v. PowellDistrict of Columbia· 2002-08-08· cited 116×
- Independent Petroleum Association of America v. Bruce BabbittD.C. Circuit· 1996-11-21· cited 100×
- Kreis v. Secretary of the Air ForceD.C. Circuit· 2005-05-06· cited 64×
- Jesse I. Etelson v. Office of Personnel ManagementD.C. Circuit· 1982-06-29· cited 54×
Other cases named Wilhelmus v. Geren
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.