Skip to main content
· 7/13/2011

Wilhelmus v. Geren

Citations

  • 796 F. Supp. 2d 157
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75020
  • 2011 WL 2714854

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[njothing could be more arbitrary or capricious” than “two identical cases [being] decided differently”
  • applying this distinction after both parties agreed that the ordinary, non-military standard of review should apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James E. Boasberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.